Subject: memory vs cpu

From: Jason Taylor <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:37:27 -0600 (CST)

Which is netatalk more dependent on.  I'm looking at setting up a machine 
to serve up to 100 machines connected at once under linux.  

----
-  Jason Taylor
-  [email-masked]
-  [email-masked]
-  http://www.at.vanderbilt.edu/users/jason
---

---

From: Rich Sudlow <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 09:36:30 -0500

While I haven't tested this on linux. I have tested this with SunOS on 
a SPARC20/71. We ran out of memory well before running out of CPU power.
Having the extra memory greatly helps increase the speed of reads when
using netatalk.

Rich

>From [email-masked] Thu Mar 28 20:46 EST 1996
>Resent-Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:37:27 -0600 (CST)
>From: Jason Taylor <[email-masked]>
>Subject: memory vs cpu
>To: netatalk <[email-masked]>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Resent-To: [email-masked]
>Resent-From: [email-masked]
>Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:01:56 -0500
>Resent-Sender: [email-masked]
>
>